At a glance: Choose a minimum of three social media platforms relevant to your field of study or inquiry question Assess sources based on CRAAP validity checklist with goal to inform an audience with similar interests Annotations should be roughly two paragraphs Cite using APA, MLA, or Chicago-style depending on your major. Social Media to Include: Include a minimum of three social media platforms: one that you would recommend for someone at your stage of academic and professional development, one used for a different purpose that you would recommend for someone at your stage of academic and professional development, one that you would not recommend for someone at your stage of academic and professional development because of either lack of relevance or lack of credibility. Format for Bibliographic Entries: Citation guidelines for social media sources are normally for specific communications, such as an individual Tweet or Facebook post. For the purposes of your annotated bibliography in CRIT 502, include enough information in each bibliographic entry that your readers will know what the social media platform is and how to access it. Example: Facebook Page for the American Psychological Association American Psychological Association on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/AmericanPsychologicalAssociation Example: Twitter Feed for the APA Style Blog APA Style Blog Twitter Feed, https://twitter.com/APA_Style Content for Annotations: The goal of this section of your annotated bibliography will be to show how organizations use specific social media platforms. (For example: report on how the National Endowment for the Humanities uses Twitter.) Each annotation will be in two parts. The first part will answer the following three questions: Who is communicating with whom (practitioner with practitioner, professional organization with practitioners, novice with expert, etc.)? What are they communicating (news, topics of concern, best practices, resources, etc.)? Why are they communicating (for what purpose: problem-solving, networking, information-sharing, etc.)? The second part of the annotation will be your evaluation of the social communication medium’s credibility and your assessment of its relevance and usefulness for someone at your stage of academic and professional development. How well does it meet the criteria on our validity checklist? Would you recommend it? If you determine that the communication medium is credible, but not relevant for someone at your stage of academic and professional development, who would you recommend it for? Transferable Skills Development: Make sure that your summary of information is in your own words!
#Juvenile #Delinquincy #related #bad #parenting